Validated · Transparent · Human-centered

AI does the work. Humans keep the judgment.

2gnoMe AI turns the evidence you already collect into clear, framework-aligned feedback, saving evaluators time while keeping professional judgment exactly where it belongs: with educators.

~1 hr
saved per teacher on narrative writing
61%*
of observed skill changes are improvements
~90%
district retention over three years
0
automated scoring or evaluation decisions

* Of teaching-component ratings that change between baseline and end-of-year observations, 61% shift upward. Internal platform data.

Anonymized evidence in. A framework-aligned draft out. A human reviews and approves every word.
Why it matters

Districts collect the evidence. 2gnoMe AI turns it into feedback.

Enormous effort goes into collecting observation notes, evidence, and reflection data, yet much of it stays locked in forms. 2gnoMe AI turns that evidence into clear, aligned, actionable feedback, without automating judgment or scoring.

Better use of time

Save an hour per teacher

Evaluators get back about an hour per teacher on narrative writing alone, time they can reinvest in coaching, classroom visits, and real conversations with educators.

Consistency

Aligned to your framework

Feedback is organized around your chosen teaching framework, like Danielson's FFT, making evidence easier to interpret, compare, and act on across classrooms and buildings.

Growth

Actionable, teacher-centered

Drafts highlight strengths, focus areas, trends, and next steps, giving teachers clearer, more respectful feedback that supports professional growth, not just compliance.

How it works

Evidence in. Meaningful feedback out.

The pipeline is straightforward, and every step keeps a human in control. Evaluators review, edit, and approve before anything reaches a teacher.

1

Observation evidence

Notes, ratings, and artifacts captured in 2gnoMe during classroom visits

2

Anonymized export

Evidence is anonymized, no names, emails, or direct identifiers sent to AI

3

AI instruction file

Framework-aligned instructions guide the AI to draft in the right language

4

Draft feedback

AI generates a coherent, fully editable narrative organized to the framework

5

Human review & edit

Evaluator rewrites in their own voice and approves before sharing

The AI never scores, labels, or makes evaluation decisions. Evaluators retain full authorship and accountability.

 
▶ Watch: AI for Feedback in action
Validated AI

Built to strengthen human judgment, not replace it.

Two independent validations: one from the framework partner, one from a multi-school system already in production. Below each, the voice behind it.

The Danielson Group AI Validation badge
Independently reviewedThe Danielson GroupFramework for Teaching · AI for Feedback validated, with Lindsay Prendergast.
2gnoMe shows what responsible AI should look like in education. Its approach is transparent and evidence-based, and it keeps educators at the center.
Lindsay PrendergastLindsay PrendergastAssistant Director of Strategy & Development · The Danielson Group
In production useDiocese of Charleston31 schools · 800+ educators, with Shaileen Riginos, Associate Superintendent.
2gnoMe has given our schools a coherent, respectful way to support teachers, and the AI feature only strengthens that. It helps principals be more intentional with their time and more consistent with their feedback.
Shaileen RiginosShaileen RiginosAssociate Superintendent · Diocese of Charleston

🔒 What stays protected

  • Anonymized data only, no names, emails, or direct identifiers
  • No AI scoring, label assignment, or automated evaluation decisions
  • No teacher or student data stored by the AI or reused for training
  • FERPA-compliant environment managed on AWS by 2gnoMe

🧑‍🏫 What stays human

  • Evaluators retain full authorship and accountability
  • Drafts are editable and rewritable in the evaluator's own voice
  • Feedback remains evidence-based, respectful, and growth-oriented
  • AI accelerates clarity, people define the message
FERPA-compliant environment Hosted on AWS No teacher or student data trains the AI AI validated by The Danielson Group
From the field

Principals, coaches, and evaluators.

Early field testing shows strong trust and time savings, without losing the nuance of human feedback.

The draft gave me a clear starting point instead of a blank page. I still make it my own, but I'm not spending my nights wordsmithing.
PrincipalIdaho
It doesn't evaluate for me, it organizes what I already know about the teacher in a way that's easier to share and discuss.
Instructional CoachColorado
The alignment to the Framework for Teaching is what sold our team. It feels like a support, not a shortcut.
District EvaluatorSouth Carolina
Turning it on

Fast, safe, and practical to roll out.

Because the AI feature is built on top of the existing 2gnoMe platform, districts can pilot quickly and scale without changing their core systems.

1

Activate

The AI feature turns on inside your existing 2gnoMe portal, no new login, no new system, no IT project.

2

Observe

Evaluators conduct observations as usual. Evidence accumulates in the platform the way it always has.

3

Review & share

AI drafts the narrative. The evaluator reviews, edits in their voice, approves, and shares with the teacher.

Start with one school. Districts can pilot with a single building and scale district-wide without changing any core workflows. Most schools generate their first AI-assisted feedback draft within the first observation cycle. If you are still setting up the platform underneath it, the timeline, roles, training, and first ninety days are laid out on implementation and support.
Where this fits

AI that supports educators, not replaces them.

AI for Feedback is one part of 2gnoMe. See how it connects to reflection, observation, and professional learning across the platform.